The debate over the relative safety of electronic cigarettes (vaping) compared to traditional tobacco cigarette smoking (TCS) is ongoing, with concerns about the long-term health effects of both practices. Vaping is often marketed as a safer alternative to smoking, but research findings are mixed and the impact on health is still being evaluated.
Long-term exposure to both vaping and traditional smoking has been shown to induce cardiovascular dysfunction, with similar levels of disease observed in both practices. The severity of cardiovascular disease from vaping can increase with the duration of exposure and nicotine content.
Vaping and smoking have been associated with detrimental effects on pulmonary function, with both practices leading to reduced respiratory function compared to non-smokers. However, maximum respiratory pressures did not differ significantly between vapers, smokers, and non-smokers.
E-cigarette vapor contains fewer toxins than tobacco smoke, and vaping is reported to be an effective method for smoking cessation. Despite this, there is concern about the health impact on young people and the potential for increased nicotine addiction.
The current literature suggests that vaping could be a “harm reduction” alternative to smoking and may aid in smoking cessation, but more rigorous investigations are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of e-cigarettes.
Vaping has been found to cause similar effects as smoking on lung and cardiovascular function, but the long-term effects, especially on muscle function, require further study.
In conclusion, both vaping and traditional smoking have been linked to negative health outcomes, particularly in terms of cardiovascular and respiratory function. While vaping may contain fewer toxins and has potential as a smoking cessation tool, the long-term health effects are not fully understood, and it may not be a completely safe alternative to smoking. Further research is needed to fully assess the health implications of vaping compared to traditional smoking.
Source:
| Papers (10) | Insights |
|---|---|
Not addressed in the paper. | |
Vaping has similar effects as smoking on lung and cardiovascular function. Long-term effects, especially on muscle function, require further investigation. Both pose risks to health. | |
Vapes induce similar acute cardiovascular effects as cigarettes in young adults, suggesting comparable detrimental impact on cardiovascular health. Both should be considered harmful. | |
Vapes and cigarettes both pose health risks; vaping linked to EVALI lung injury, while smoking to lung cancer and COPD. Neither is considered safe for use. | |
Vapes, like e-cigarettes, offer an alternative to traditional cigarettes. However, the paper does not directly compare the overall health impacts of vapes versus cigarettes. | |
Vapes, including nicotine-free ones, pose health risks like traditional cigarettes. Further research is needed to fully understand the extent of harm caused by vaping. | |
Vapes have similar detrimental effects on lung function as cigarettes, indicating they may not be a healthier alternative to smoking based on the study findings. | |
29 Sep 2022 | Vapes are considered less harmful than cigarettes, but still pose risks. Vaping can increase cardiovascular events compared to non-users, especially when used alongside smoking. |
Vaping devices, although lacking some carcinogens found in cigarettes, still pose risks due to the production of harmful substances, impacting cardiopulmonary function and potentially contributing to lung cancer. | |
Vaping devices are not benign; they produce harmful substances impacting cardiopulmonary function and potentially leading to lung cancer, suggesting they are not safer than cigarettes. |
